top of page
Search

šŸ” The Importance of Preparation Before Interviewing a Candidate: Why ā€œGut Feelingā€ Isnā€™t Enough

  • Feb 25
  • 18 min read

Same Thinking, Same Problems. Diverse Thinking, Next-Level Success and the Hidden Drain on Your Business: The Real Cost of Turnover šŸ’°


šŸ“¢ ā€œWe just clicked!ā€ ā€“ Ever walked out of an interview convinced you found the perfect hire, only to realize a few months later that they werenā€™t the right fit after all?

two lego storm troupers

Hiring isnā€™t just about skills, experience, or even personality.

Itā€™s about alignment, motivation, and team balanceā€”elements that canā€™t be assessed by gut feeling alone.

Yet, too many leaders walk into interviews unprepared, relying on instinct rather than a structured approach.

The result?

Bad hires, cultural mismatches, and costly turnover.



If you want to build a high-performing, motivated team, you need to go beyond first impressions.

Letā€™s explore why preparation is the secret weapon to hiring successā€”and how skipping it can backfire.


šŸ›‘ Are They Really the Best Hire? Or Did Your Brain Just Play a Trick on You?

This is where hiring bias sneaks inā€”specifically, similarity bias and confirmation bias.

Did you know that humans are wired to like people who remind them of themselves? Thatā€™s why the famous ā€œgut feelingā€ in hiring can be one of the biggest traps out there. šŸšØ


šŸ§  Similarity Bias:

We naturally trust and like people who remind us ofā€¦ well, ourselves.

šŸ” Confirmation Bias:

Once we like someone, we only focus on the things that confirm our good impression.

And just like that, youā€™ve fallen into the trap of hiring someone not because theyā€™re what the team needsā€”but because they feel comfortable.


šŸšØ The Danger of Hiring in Your Own Image

A team full of people who think alike, act alike, and solve problems alike might feel harmonious at firstā€”but in reality?

Itā€™s a recipe for stagnation, blind spots, and dysfunction.



šŸšØ Scenario: The Perfect Hireā€¦ Until They Werenā€™t

Imagine this:

You're hiring for a key role in your team.

The interview goes greatā€”the candidate is confident, personable, and shares similar interests with you.

They remind you of yourself when you were starting out, and they seem to have the right experience.

So, you make the hire.


A few months in, cracks begin to show.

They struggle with tasks outside their comfort zone.

Their motivation dips when projects donā€™t go exactly as planned.

They clash with existing team membersā€”turns out, their leadership style is more about control than collaboration.


What went wrong?

You hired based on a ā€œgood feelingā€ rather than structured evaluation. 

You saw similarities between yourself and the candidate, but didnā€™t consider what the team actually needed.


This happens more often than we realize.

Leaders unconsciously gravitate toward candidates who mirror their own strengths and personalitiesā€”but a successful team needs diversity, not a room full of clones.



šŸ’ø When People Walk Out the Door so Does Money: The Silent Costs of Semi-Decisions

The Real Cost of Turnover

Every time an employee leaves, the costs stack upā€”not just in recruitment but in lost productivity, broken workflows, and declining morale.

Think about it:

šŸ“‰ Knowledge Loss ā€“ Expertise, experience, and key insights walk out the door, leaving gaps that take time to fill.

šŸ•µļø Recruitment & Training ā€“ Finding, hiring, and onboarding a replacement isnā€™t just time-consumingā€”itā€™s expensive.

ā³ Productivity Lag ā€“ It takes months for a new hire to reach full capacity, and the cost of "inner termination" (when employees mentally check out before they leave) is even higher.

āš ļø Burnout Ripple Effect ā€“ Remaining employees pick up the slack, leading to stress, frustration, and eventual disengagement.

šŸ¢ Culture Instability ā€“ Constant exits create a revolving-door effect, chipping away at trust, stability, and long-term team cohesion.

šŸšØ Reputation Damage ā€“ High turnover sends red flags to future top talent, making it harder to attract the right people.


And yes, we all know by now that people leave because of not-so-great leadership.

And the worst part? Most of it is preventable. Semi-thought-out hiring decisions, overlooked motivation mismatches, and poor cultural alignment silently drain your company. Leadership starts hereā€”at the very first handshake. Hire with intention, build with purpose, and watch retention (and performance) soar.


Most leaders donā€™t realize that the problem often starts before Day 1. 

A hiring process that prioritizes skills over motivation, "fit" over "balance," and gut instinct over structured assessment is a recipe for short-lived hires.

So, if you're wondering what all this turnover is really costing youā€”down to the last centā€”it's time to take a hard look at the numbers.


šŸ’” Need a little shocker? Try our Retention Cost Calculatorā€”because sometimes, the cost of "not quite the right fit" is bigger than you think.

But- we are here for you!



Real-World Example: The Cost of Team Imbalance

Scenario 1: The Visionariesā€™ Trap

Imagine youā€™re building a fast-growing startup.

You and your first hires are big-picture strategistsā€”visionaries who love innovation.

Sounds great, right? Not so fast.


šŸš§ Whatā€™s the problem?

āš  No one is detail-oriented. Projects stay in ā€œgreat ideaā€ mode but never get executed.

āš  No one is pushing back. Everyone agrees too easily, leading to risky, unchecked decisions.

āš  No one is focused on structure. 

The company lacks scalable processes, leading to chaos as it grows.


šŸ“Œ The result?Your company struggles with execution.

Deadlines are missed. 

And suddenly, your once-promising startup is bleeding money.


 

Scenario 2: The Data-Driven Deadlock

šŸ’¼ A corporate team is filled with analytical, data-driven minds (e.g. Structogram: Blue).

They thrive on logic, facts, and precision.


šŸš§ Whatā€™s the problem?

āš  Analysis paralysis. Every decision is overanalyzed, slowing progress.

āš  Lack of risk-taking. No one is bold enough to experiment, leading to stagnation.

āš  Customer disconnect. The team focuses on numbers but fails to connect emotionally with clients.

šŸ“Œ The result?

A slow-moving, innovation-starved company that misses market opportunities.


 

Scenario 3: The Overpowering Dominance

šŸš€ A high-performance team is filled with dominant, high-achieving personalities (e.g. Structogram: Red).


šŸš§ Whatā€™s the problem?

āš  Too many strong personalities competing for control.

āš  Collaboration suffers because everyone wants to lead, and no one wants to follow.

āš  Burnout becomes a major issueā€”because pushing harder and faster is the only culture that exists.

šŸ“Œ The result?

A high-performance cultureā€¦ until people quit from exhaustion or internal conflicts explode.


Solution: How to Hire Beyond Bias & Build a Balanced Team

The best hiring decisions donā€™t come from gut feelings aloneā€”they come from intentionally designing a well-rounded team.

Hereā€™s how to ensure youā€™re not just hiring who feels ā€œcomfortable,ā€ but who truly adds value to your teamā€™s composition.


 

šŸ” Step 1: Map Out Your Teamā€™s Strengths & Gaps

Before you even post the job, take a hard look at your existing team. What strengths are overrepresented? Where are the gaps?

šŸ›  How to do it:

  • Use personality and strengths-based assessments like Structogram, DISC, StrengthsFinder, MBTI to analyze team composition.

  • Identify which skills, traits, and work styles dominateā€”and which are missing.


šŸ“Œ Example: Googleā€™s Hiring for Cognitive Diversity

Google doesnā€™t just hire for technical skills; they assess cognitive diversity to prevent groupthink.

Their hiring panels ensure that new employees challenge existing ideas, not just reinforce them.

šŸŽÆ Your Action- before hiring, assess whatā€™s missing in your team.

  • Use DISC, Structogram, StrengthsFinder, or MBTI to analyze team dynamics.

  • Identify whatā€™s missingā€”Do you need more structure? More creativity? Stronger execution?


 

šŸŽÆ Step 2: Define the Roleā€™s ā€œTeam Fitā€ā€”Not Just Skills

Instead of asking, ā€œWho do I like?ā€, shift your focus to ā€œWhat does the team actually need?ā€.

šŸ”¹ Think ā€˜Culture Add,ā€™ Not Just ā€˜Culture Fitā€™

  • Donā€™t just hire people who fit the current cultureā€”hire those who can bring a missing dynamic.

  • A great hire shouldnā€™t blend inā€”they should complement and challenge the teamā€™s way of thinking.


šŸ“Œ Example: Netflixā€™s Culture-First Hiring Approach

Netflix prioritizes cultural add over cultural fit.

They donā€™t just hire skilled professionalsā€”they hire people who push their culture forward rather than blend in.

šŸŽÆ Your Action- ask: What kind of mindset & motivation does this role require?

  • Instead of asking, ā€œWho do I like?ā€, ask ā€œWho will challenge and complement the team?ā€

  • Define intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivation needs for the role.


 

šŸ§  Step 3: Use Behavioral Assessments in Interviews

Rather than taking candidates at their word, test how they actually think and work.

šŸ’¬ Ask probing questions that uncover true motivation, decision-making style, and team dynamics: 

1ļøāƒ£ ā€œTell me about a time you worked with someone completely different from you.

How did you collaborate?ā€āž Reveals adaptability and ability to work with diverse personalities.


2ļøāƒ£ ā€œHow do you typically make decisionsā€”logic first, gut feeling, or team input?ā€

āž Identifies dominant thinking patterns and whether they match the teamā€™s needs.


3ļøāƒ£ ā€œDo you prefer structured workflows or adaptability?ā€

āž Helps determine if they thrive in rigid vs. fast-moving environments.


šŸ“Œ Example: Amazonā€™s ā€œOwnershipā€ Interviews

Amazon uses the Leadership Principle of Ownership, asking candidates behavioral questions like:

šŸ—£ ā€œTell me about a time you took ownership of a problem outside your job scope.ā€

šŸŽÆ Your Action:

āŒ Donā€™t fall for rehearsed answers. Challenge candidates to prove their drive.

  • Use behavioral & situational questions like:

    • ā€œWhat excites you most about this role, and why?ā€

    • ā€œTell me about a time you stayed motivated despite setbacks.ā€

  • Listen for energy and passion, not just polished words.


 
diverse lego dolls

šŸ‘„ Step 4: Involve a Diverse Hiring Panel

Bias is hard to spot when youā€™re the only one making the call.

Bringing in different perspectives ensures youā€™re challenged in your decision-making.


šŸ‘€ How to do it:

  • Have someone from a different personality type in the roomā€”if youā€™re a big-picture leader, include a detail-focused team member.

  • Encourage constructive disagreementā€”hiring should never be a rubber-stamp process.

  • Have structured evaluation criteria so decisions arenā€™t just gut-driven.


šŸ“Œ Example: Airbnbā€™s ā€œIntentional Hiringā€ Approach

Airbnb removes bias by using cross-functional interview panels.

This prevents one leaderā€™s personal preference from swaying the decision.

šŸŽÆ Your Action:

  • Have different personality types weigh in.

  • Use structured scorecards to focus on key criteriaā€”not just ā€œgut feeling.ā€


 

šŸ§² Step 5: Retain Motivation Long-Term

Hiring the right people is just the beginningā€”keeping them motivated over time is where the real challenge begins.

Motivation isnā€™t a one-time spark; itā€™s a fire that needs constant fueling through purpose, growth, and autonomy.


šŸ‘€ How to do it:

šŸ”¹ Align daily work with personal values ā€“ Employees stay motivated when their work matters beyond just tasks.

Show how their role contributes to the bigger picture.

šŸ”¹ Use continuous feedback loops ā€“ Donā€™t wait for annual reviews.

Frequent, meaningful check-ins help sustain motivation.

šŸ”¹ Encourage autonomy ā€“ Micromanagement kills motivation.

Give employees ownership over projects to keep them engaged and accountable.

šŸ”¹ Recognize contributions ā€“ People donā€™t just work for money.

Public appreciation, growth opportunities, and purpose-driven incentives drive long-term commitment.


šŸ“Œ Example: Patagoniaā€™s Purpose-Driven Work Model

Patagoniaā€™s employees are deeply invested in environmental sustainability. 

Instead of just giving them jobs, Patagonia nurtures intrinsic motivation by aligning company values with personal valuesā€”allowing employees to take time off for activism.

āž” Result: Lower turnover, high engagement, and a workforce that feels deeply connected to their mission.


šŸŽÆ Your Action:

  • Make motivation personal ā€“ Understand what truly drives each team member.

  • Link daily work to company impact ā€“ Help employees see the bigger purpose behind their contributions.

  • Foster autonomy ā€“ Give employees the freedom and responsibility to innovate and lead.


The Final Reality Check: Hiring for Growth, Not Comfort

āœ… The next time you instantly click with a candidate, ask yourself:

Are they what the team is missingā€”or just what feels familiar?

āœ… Before making an offer, challenge your assumptions:

If this person was the opposite of me, would I still see them as the best fit?

āœ… The best leaders donā€™t just hire people they likeā€”they hire people who make the team better.


šŸ’” Key Takeaway:

The Right Fit is NOT the Most Familiar Fit


Great teams arenā€™t built by cloning successful personalities.

They are crafted by thoughtfully integrating complementary strengths.


So next time you find yourself instantly liking a candidate because theyā€™re just like youā€”pause.

ā“ Is this person really what the team is missing?

ā“ Are you hiring for comfortā€”or for growth?


šŸŽÆ The best leaders donā€™t just hire people they like.

 They hire people who will make the team better.



Final Thought: Great Hiring is a Strategy, Not a Gut Feeling

šŸ’” Avoid hiring people just because they "feel right." 

The best teams are built on diverse strengths, intrinsic drive, and long-term motivation.


šŸ“¢ Next Steps:

  • Use our Retention Calculator to see the real cost of turnover.

  • Explore our courses & consulting to master hiring & motivation strategies.

  • Build a team thatā€™s motivated to growā€”not just to get the job.



 

šŸ§  The Missing Puzzle Piece: Neurodiversity in Hiring & Leadership

While weā€™ve explored different personality types, strengths, and team dynamics, thereā€™s one major piece we havenā€™t explicitly addressedā€”neurodiversity.

Not every brain works the same way, and thatā€™s not a flawā€”itā€™s a strength. In fact, diverse thinking is the key to ultimate success.


Some people thrive in structure, others in free-flowing innovation. Some process visually, others sequentially. Some hyper-focus, others connect the dots between seemingly unrelated ideas. This kind of cognitive diversity fuels problem-solving, innovation, and resilience in ways that a one-size-fits-all team never could.

Yet traditional hiring often filters out great talent by valuing certain communication and work styles over others.

šŸ”¹ A neurodivergent thinker may struggle with rapid-fire Q&As in interviews but excel in deep, strategic problem-solving.

šŸ”¹ A brilliant innovator might need flexible deadlines to work in bursts of hyper-focus rather than a rigid 9-to-5 routine.

šŸ”¹ A leader with a different way of processing information might communicate in a way that feels ā€˜unconventionalā€™ā€”but their insights could revolutionize a business.


šŸ” What This Means for Leadership & Hiring:

āœ” Cognitive Diversity Strengthens Teams ā€“ A mix of linear and non-linear thinkers, deep focus vs. rapid ideation, structured vs. intuitive approaches fuels innovation.


āœ” Interview Bias Eliminates Great Talent ā€“ Many neurodivergent professionals struggle with traditional hiring formats (e.g., timed tests, high-pressure Q&A) but excel in real-world problem-solving.


āœ” Different Leadership Styles Need Different Support ā€“ A neurodivergent leader might struggle with sensory overload in open offices but bring unparalleled strategic depth in high-focus tasks.


šŸ’” Inclusive leadership means making space for all kinds of thinkers.

Hiring, retaining, and leading with neurodiversity in mind isnā€™t just ethicalā€”itā€™s a competitive advantage. Because the best teams arenā€™t built from identical minds; they thrive on the power of different perspectives.


The best teams arenā€™t built on samenessā€”they thrive on difference.

When we move beyond hiring for comfort and truly embrace diverse thinking styles, we donā€™t just build better teamsā€”we build workplaces where everyone can contribute at their best.

Inclusion isnā€™t about checking a box. Itā€™s about unlocking potential. And leaders who get this right donā€™t just retain talentā€”they cultivate greatness.


šŸ” Hiring Question Catalogue Based on Different Personalities

Why Personality-Based Hiring Matters šŸ§ 

Different personalities thrive in different roles, environments, and challenges.

A data-driven strategist might struggle in a high-energy sales role, while an intuitive creative may feel stifled in rigid, process-heavy structures.

Thatā€™s why hiring shouldnā€™t just be about skillsā€”itā€™s about fit.

This question catalogue combines insights from Structogram (biologically driven personality traits) and DISC (behavioral tendencies in work environments) to help you assess how candidates will truly perform, collaborate, and engage in your team.


Why This Combo?

āœ… Structogram explains how people naturally think, feel, and react (brain biology).

āœ… DISC adds how they behave and communicate in professional settings (learned behavior).

āœ… Together, they provide a complete pictureā€”from innate tendencies to work habits.

So before you hire someone based on a "gut feeling"ā€”use this guide to dig deeper, uncover real motivations, and build a well-balanced team that actually works.


āš ļø Beware of Box Thinking! 

Personality frameworks like Structogram or DISC provide valuable insights, but they only account for about 50% of what makes a person tick.

People are complex and multi-dimensionalā€”personality is just one piece of the puzzle.


Other Key Factors That Shape a Person Beyond Personality Type:

1ļøāƒ£ Life Experience: 

A highly analytical person (šŸ”µ Blue) who grew up in an entrepreneurial family might develop strong risk-taking instincts.

2ļøāƒ£ Cultural Background: 

Someone from a collectivist culture may prioritize harmony (šŸŸ¢ Green) even if their personality leans toward dominance (šŸ”“ Red).

3ļøāƒ£ Upbringing & Family Dynamics: 

A naturally extroverted person (šŸŸ” Yellow) raised in a reserved household may develop a more balanced, introspective side.

4ļøāƒ£ Education & Training: 

A creative thinker (šŸŸ” Yellow) with rigorous scientific training may exhibit structured thinking (šŸ”µ Blue) in their professional life.

5ļøāƒ£ Personal Values: 

A dominant leader (šŸ”“ Red) who values social impact may temper their decisiveness with compassion (šŸŸ¢ Green).

6ļøāƒ£ Career Development: 

A highly detail-oriented engineer (šŸ”µ Blue) may learn persuasive skills if they transition into sales (šŸŸ” Yellow).

7ļøāƒ£ Stress & Pressure Responses: 

In normal situations, someone may seem introverted, but under pressure, their leadership instincts take over.

8ļøāƒ£ Passions & Interests: 

A numbers-driven (šŸ”µ Blue) person who loves adventure sports might be more spontaneous and risk-taking than expected.

9ļøāƒ£ Cognitive Styles: 

Two people with the same personality type may have vastly different ways of processing informationā€”one might think in visual metaphors, the other in linear logic.

šŸ”Ÿ Merging Types: 

Most people are a mix! A structured yet empathetic leader (šŸ”µ + šŸŸ¢) or a charismatic yet analytical strategist (šŸŸ” + šŸ”µ) will behave differently than a ā€œpureā€ type.


The Influence of Gender and Age

Gender & Personality: 

While gender doesnā€™t determine personality, societal expectations and experiences can influence behavioral expression.

Age & Personality Evolution: 

Personality isnā€™t staticā€”it evolves over time due to life stages and career growth.


šŸ’” Key Takeaway: 

Avoid rigid labels. Personality types give direction, not definition. Always assess the whole person when making hiring decisions!


 

AI picture of a neurodivergent brain Alexandra Robuste

šŸŸ¢ The Green Personality (People-Oriented, Empathetic, Collaborative)

šŸŸ© The Relationship-Oriented Harmonizer

šŸ’š Key Traits: Empathetic, team-oriented, patient, people-first, avoids conflict.

šŸš§ Risk in Hiring Too Many Greens: Avoids confrontation, prioritizes people over deadlines.

Best Work Environments: People-focused, collaborative, structured, and supportive workplaces.

Common Roles & Industries:

āœ” Therapist / Psychologist šŸ§ 

āœ” HR Manager / Employee Well-Being Specialist šŸ’™

āœ” Nurse / Caregiver šŸ„

āœ” Teacher / Special Education Expert šŸ“š

āœ” Social Worker šŸ”

āœ” Community Organizer šŸ˜

āœ” Customer Support Lead šŸŽ§

āœ” Mediator / Conflict Resolution Specialist āš–ļø

āœ” Non-Profit Director šŸŒ

āœ” Pastoral Care / Chaplain ā›Ŗļø

āœ” Personal Coach / Mentor šŸŒ±

āœ” Family Business Operator šŸ 

āœ” Humanitarian Aid Worker šŸš‘

āœ” Environmental Conservationist šŸŒ±

āœ” Librarian šŸ“–

Biggest Challenge: Can struggle with confrontation, decision-making, and taking risks.


šŸ“¢ Hiring Questions for Greens:

šŸ–„ļø Describe your desk. ā€œA mix of personal and work itemsā€”pictures of loved ones, a cozy vibe.ā€

Cluttered but cozyā€”family photos, plants, and a few personal trinkets. Might have inspirational quotes pinned to a board.

Work thrives on relationship-building and collaboration.


Questions for Green Personalities

1ļøāƒ£ How do you handle conflicts within a team?

2ļøāƒ£ Tell me about a time you helped a colleague succeed.

3ļøāƒ£ What role do workplace relationships play in your motivation?

4ļøāƒ£ How do you handle emotionally charged situations at work?

5ļøāƒ£ Describe a time when you had to support a team member through a challenge.

6ļøāƒ£ Whatā€™s the best way to resolve misunderstandings with a co-worker?

7ļøāƒ£ How do you build trust with new team members?

8ļøāƒ£ What would your ideal team culture look like?

9ļøāƒ£ When have you had to stand up for a colleague or a value you believed in?

šŸ”Ÿ How do you balance empathy with making difficult business decisions?


 

šŸ”µ The Blue Personality (Data-Driven, Analytical, Logical Thinker)

šŸŸ¦ The Analytical & Detail-Oriented Thinker

šŸ“Š Key Traits: Precise, structured, logical, data-driven, cautious.

šŸš§ Risk in Hiring Too Many Blues: Overanalyzing, slow decision-making, lack of flexibility.

Best Work Environments: Research-heavy, structured, quality-focused, and data-driven workplaces.

Common Roles & Industries:

āœ” Data Scientist / Analyst šŸ“Š

āœ” Financial Planner / Accountant šŸ’°

āœ” Research Scientist šŸ”¬

āœ” Software Engineer / Developer šŸ’»

āœ” Aerospace Engineer āœˆļø

āœ” Surgeon šŸ„

āœ” Risk Management Specialist šŸš§

āœ” Cybersecurity Expert šŸ”

āœ” Economist šŸ“ˆ

āœ” Lawyer (Corporate or Compliance) āš–ļø

āœ” Architect šŸ›

āœ” Supply Chain & Logistics Manager šŸšš

āœ” Patent Attorney šŸ“

āœ” Chess Grandmaster ā™Ÿ

āœ” University Professor šŸŽ“

Biggest Challenge: Can be overly cautious, slow to adapt, and struggle with emotional intelligence.


šŸ“¢ Hiring Questions for Blues:

šŸ–„ļø Describe your desk. ā€œPerfectly organized. Spreadsheets open, notes color-coded.ā€

 Extremely organizedā€”everything in neat stacks or digital files. Minimal decoration except perhaps an efficiency-boosting gadget or multiple monitors. Work thrives on data, precision, and deep thinking.


Questions for Blue Personalities

1ļøāƒ£ How do you ensure accuracy when working with complex data or processes?

2ļøāƒ£ Walk me through your process for analyzing a problem before making a decision.

3ļøāƒ£ Whatā€™s your approach when a project requires speed but sacrifices precision?

4ļøāƒ£ Describe a time when attention to detail saved a project.

5ļøāƒ£ How do you communicate technical information to non-technical team members?

6ļøāƒ£ What motivates you moreā€”solving a problem or creating a system that prevents the problem?

7ļøāƒ£ How do you handle ambiguity in decision-making?

8ļøāƒ£ How do you track and measure your success at work?

9ļøāƒ£ Tell me about a time when you identified an issue no one else noticed.

šŸ”Ÿ How do you react when a decision is made based on intuition rather than data?


 

šŸ”“ The Red Personality (Decisive, Direct, Goal-Oriented, Competitive)

šŸŸ„ The Dominant & Action-Oriented Leader

šŸ”„ Key Traits: Bold, competitive, decisive, goal-driven, thrives on control.

šŸš§ Risk in Hiring Too Many Reds: Power struggles, lack of collaboration, burnout.

šŸŽÆ Best Fit For: Leadership roles, sales, crisis management, decision-making.

Best Work Environments: Fast-paced, high-stakes, and performance-driven cultures.

Common Roles & Industries:

āœ” CEO / Founder šŸš€

āœ” Sales Executive / Business Development šŸ“ˆ

āœ” Crisis Manager / Turnaround Specialist āš ļø

āœ” Venture Capitalist šŸ’°

āœ” Lawyer (Litigation) āš–ļø

āœ” Head of Operations šŸ—

āœ” Political Campaign Manager šŸŽ¤

āœ” Military / Special Forces Commander šŸŽ–

āœ” Sports Coach / Professional Athlete šŸ†

āœ” Investment Banker šŸ“Š

āœ” Entrepreneur / Startup Leader šŸ’”

āœ” Emergency Room Doctor šŸ„

āœ” High-Stakes Negotiator šŸ¤

āœ” Stock Trader šŸ“‰šŸ“ˆ

āœ” Real Estate Developer šŸ¢

Biggest Challenge: They may struggle with patience, emotional intelligence, and teamwork if not balanced.


šŸ“¢ Hiring Questions for Reds:

šŸ–„ļø Describe your desk. ā€œOrganized chaos. Everything has a purposeā€”even the mess.ā€

Sleek, minimal, high-performance. Likely has a standing desk, a whiteboard full of KPIs, and a neatly arranged notebook for strategy planning.

Work thrives on results, speed, and challenges.


Questions for Red Personalities

1ļøāƒ£ How do you handle high-pressure situations with tight deadlines?

2ļøāƒ£ Tell me about a time you set an ambitious goal and achieved it.

3ļøāƒ£ What role does competition play in your motivation?

4ļøāƒ£ How do you handle teammates who donā€™t meet your level of urgency?

5ļøāƒ£ Whatā€™s your approach to making tough decisions quickly?

6ļøāƒ£ Describe a time when you had to take control of a situation.

7ļøāƒ£ How do you push for results when facing resistance from others?

8ļøāƒ£ Whatā€™s your strategy when a project isnā€™t meeting expectations?

9ļøāƒ£ How do you balance speed and efficiency with quality?

šŸ”Ÿ Have you ever had to take responsibility for a failed initiative? What did you do?


 

šŸŸ” The Yellow Personality (Creative, Spontaneous, Energetic, Visionary)

šŸŸØ The Creative & Spontaneous Visionary

šŸŽØ Key Traits: Innovative, spontaneous, enthusiastic, adaptable, thrives on change.

šŸš§ Risk in Hiring Too Many Yellows: Lack of follow-through, distracted by new ideas, struggles with structure.

Best Work Environments: Social, creative, dynamic, and fast-moving workplaces.

Common Roles & Industries:

āœ” Public Speaker / Influencer šŸŽ¤

āœ” Sales & Marketing Strategist šŸ“¢

āœ” Event Planner šŸŽ‰

āœ” Advertising Creative Director šŸŽØ

āœ” Journalist / TV Host šŸ“ŗ

āœ” Public Relations Manager šŸ’¬

āœ” Customer Experience Lead šŸ˜Š

āœ” Social Media Manager šŸ“±

āœ” Talent Agent / Manager šŸŽ­

āœ” Tour Guide / Travel Blogger āœˆļø

āœ” Recruiter / Headhunter šŸ¤ āœ” Entertainment Industry Executive šŸŽ¬

āœ” Restaurant or Hospitality Manager šŸ½ āœ” Luxury Brand Consultant šŸ›

āœ” Radio Host / Podcaster šŸŽ™

Biggest Challenge: Can be impulsive, lack focus, and struggle with long-term planning..


šŸ“¢ Hiring Questions for Yellows:

šŸ–„ļø Describe your desk. ā€œOrganized chaos, but I know where everything is. Sticky notes everywhere.ā€

Colorful, slightly chaotic, covered in brainstorming notes, sketches, or an assortment of gadgets.

Work thrives on ideas, innovation, and enthusiasm.


Questions for Yellow Personalities

1ļøāƒ£ What inspires you most in your work?

2ļøāƒ£ Describe a time you came up with a completely new solution to a problem.

3ļøāƒ£ How do you stay motivated when working on repetitive tasks?

4ļøāƒ£ What role does creativity play in your problem-solving approach?

5ļøāƒ£ How do you manage your ideas and keep track of tasks?

6ļøāƒ£ Tell me about a time you took a risk that paid off.

7ļøāƒ£ How do you collaborate with structured, detail-oriented colleagues?

8ļøāƒ£ Whatā€™s the most exciting project youā€™ve ever worked on?

9ļøāƒ£ How do you react when your ideas are challenged?

šŸ”Ÿ How do you bring energy and enthusiasm to your team?


šŸŽÆ How to Use These Questions in Hiring

  • Look beyond answers. Observe tone, enthusiasm, and examples to assess authenticity.

  • Mix personality types. A balanced team thrives on diverse problem-solving approaches.

  • Align motivation with role. A creative Yellow personality in a rigid finance role or a structured Blue in an unpredictable startup might struggle.


šŸ’” Final Thought: 

Hiring isnā€™t about finding the ā€œbestā€ personalityā€”itā€™s about finding the right mix for your teamā€™s long-term success.



šŸ“Œ Backed by Science:

The Best Methods for Analyzing Team and Candidate Fit

Building a well-balanced, motivated team isnā€™t guessworkā€”itā€™s science-backed strategy. 

To make data-driven hiring and team development decisions, companies use a mix of psychometric tests, personality frameworks, and behavioral analysis.


šŸ” Key Methods for Assessing Personality & Team Fit

āœ” StructogramĀ® Analysis (Rolf W. Schirm) ā€“ Identifies brain-based personality tendencies and how individuals react in leadership, teamwork, and pressure situations.

āœ” DISC Personality Test (William Moulton Marston) ā€“ Measures dominance, influence, steadiness, and conscientiousness to improve communication and collaboration.

āœ” MBTI (Myers-Briggs Type Indicator) (Katharine Cook Briggs & Isabel Briggs Myers) ā€“ Helps classify individuals into 16 personality types based on cognitive preferences.

āœ” Big Five Personality Traits (OCEAN Model) (Paul Costa & Robert McCrae) ā€“ Evaluates openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticismā€”highly validated for workplace behavior prediction.

āœ” CliftonStrengths (StrengthsFinder) (Donald O. Clifton, Gallup) ā€“ Focuses on personal strengths and how they align with different roles.

āœ” Self-Determination Theory (SDT) Assessment (Edward L. Deci & Richard M. Ryan) ā€“ Measures intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivation in candidates.

āœ” Cognitive Ability Tests (Developed in various forms by Alfred Binet & David Wechsler) ā€“ Assess logical reasoning, pattern recognition, and problem-solving skills under pressure.

āœ” Situational Judgment Tests (SJT) (Developed by Industrial & Organizational Psychologists) ā€“ Place candidates in realistic work scenarios to evaluate decision-making.

āœ” Behavioral Event Interviews (BEI) (Developed by David C. McClelland) ā€“ Structured interviews that assess past behavior to predict future performance.

āœ” HEXACO Personality Model (Kibeom Lee & Michael C. Ashton) ā€“ An alternative to the Big Five, adding a dimension for Honesty-Humility, which is key in ethical leadership assessment.

āœ” Reiss Motivation Profile (Steven Reiss) ā€“ Identifies 16 basic desires that drive individual behavior and workplace motivation.

āœ” Grit Scale (Angela Duckworth) ā€“ Measures perseverance and passion for long-term goalsā€”essential for assessing resilience.

āœ” Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI) (Robert Hogan) ā€“ Used to predict workplace performance and leadership potential based on personality traits.

āœ” Predictive Index (PI) (Arnold S. Daniels) ā€“ Helps organizations understand behavioral drives and optimize job fit.

Using a combination of these tools ensures diversity in hiring, balanced team dynamics, and long-term motivation retention.


šŸŽÆ Pro Tip: 

Donā€™t rely on one test alone. A mix of personality, motivation, and cognitive ability assessments gives a well-rounded view of a candidateā€™s true potential.


#HiringStrategy #LeadershipDevelopment #TalentAcquisition #EmployeeMotivation #RecruitmentTips #WorkplacePsychology #LeadershipScience #CultureFit #DiversityInHiring #NeuroscienceOfLeadership #PsychometricTesting #MBTI #DISCProfile #Structogram #StrengthsFinder #BigFivePersonality #SelfDeterminationTheory #HiringProcess #RetentionStrategy #FutureOfWork #DataDrivenHR #HRTech #HighPerformingTeams #OrganizationalCulture #CognitiveAssessment #WorkplaceSuccess #GrowthMindset #LeadershipExcellence #HiringBestPractices #SmartHiring #NeurodiversityAtWork #InclusiveLeadership #GentleLeading #EmpatheticLeadership #LeadershipSkills #LeadershipMindset #AuthenticLeadership #HumanCenteredLeadership #AdaptiveLeadership #EmotionalIntelligence #PsychologicalSafety #StrengthBasedLeadership #LeadershipGrowth #SelfAwareLeadership #FutureOfLeadership #ServantLeadership #LeadershipInnovation #NeuroscienceAndLeadership #PeopleFirstLeadership #ResilientLeadership

 
 
 

Kommentare


  • TikTok
  • Facebook Group
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
Copyright 2025
Empowering Visionaries. Elevating Leaders. Transforming Ideas into Impact.
Take care of yourselves.
bottom of page